Friday, January 25, 2013

Heart

I recently had the privilege of going to the Bodies Revealed Exhibit at the Da Vinci Science Center - for more information or tickets: http://body.discoverlehighvalley.com/bodies-revealed/.  My grandfather and my mother, who are both physicians, went with me and we had an amazing experience. My father, despite being surrounded by all these scientists, had no interest of going, did not want to see the (sneaky) pictures we took, and would rather not hear any of the details.  As a scientist, it’s hard for me to wrap my brain around how someone would not be interested in this.  Seeing real dissected bodies/body parts up close just awestruck me. Humans are constructed in an absolutely incredible way.  On the other hand, as a scientist, it struck me how many people were there who came just to satisfy their curiosity and learn, not being involved in the sciences at all.  Walking around, I realized how difficult it would be to see and learn from the displays if I hadn’t taken physiology last semester (and if I didn’t have two experts walking around with me). At one of the close up digestive system displays, I found myself standing next to a middle-aged couple who were commenting on the display, saying it would be much easier to understand if the display was set up in a way that showed how food would travel to the body from the mouth to the intestines and I agreed with them! Instead, they had dissections of the tongue, esophagus, the stomach, and intestines all separate with short explanations of the body part. So I explained, to the best of my ability, how food would travel and the couple thanked me profusely.  I then mentioned how this semester I would be taking a class dedicated to learning how to write and explain science for the public. The couple could not stop telling me how valuable and important they think this skill is. They said that much of the time, even when people are more educated, science gets complicated and has too many factors (political, social, etc) that go along with it that can lead people to mistrust and question science or blindly follow whatever they happen to read or hear.  That’s when I realized how truly challenging this task of explaining science to the public is. I do not want to lose the essence of science but I still want to be an easy-to-understand, influential, and interesting science writer.  The Bodies Revealed exhibit is supposed to be for the public but even then, everyone’s understanding level differs and the exhibit can always be improved.  That is why, the best thing I think I can do as a science writer, a scientist, and a person in general is to always strive to be fearless in my work, have heart, and never hesitate to improve.  Albert Einstein said, “If you can’t explain it simply, you don’t understand it well enough.”  Science writers need first, fully understand what we want to explain. We need to not only understand our point of view but the opposing points of view as well.  We need to learn the political and social influences of the topic on the public and then attempt to tackle the problem. Embrace the skepticism. That makes writing vulnerable and more "human", which will (hopefully) cause people to be more receptive to the writing. I hope to write with a point of view but still be able to incorporate differing thoughts and defend my point of view strongly.  I think having counterarguments shows the writing is fearless and strong.  To be better, we should write our science with heart.  Furthermore, we need passion and compassion – a balance between not losing the spirit of science yet still being able to get the point across to any person.  And after writing, we shouldn't hesitate to go back, revise and improve our work. We want others to have an open mind and influence them so we ourselves should be open to changes in our thoughts. Lastly, I think it’s important to hope to touch and make a difference in the lives of many but accept that there will always be people who think differently and will disagree - and that's okay. Always dream big but helping even one person is a success in my eyes.  

Thursday, January 17, 2013

Knowledge to Wisdom


Scientific literacy, in my opinion, is a necessity in today’s multifaceted and complex world.  As a scientist, I believe science is involved in all aspects of life from politics to art and vice versa.  As we read in in the article by Jon Miller for the first day of class, although the United States has the second leading scientific literacy rate in adults at approximately 28%, that rate is nowhere close to where it should be in the United States – or anywhere else for that matter.  What exactly IS scientific literacy?  Should everyone know how to read graphs and interpret complicated data?  According to the United States National Center for Education Statistics, "Scientific literacy is the knowledge and understanding of scientific concepts and processes required for personal decision making, participating in civic and cultural affairs, and economic productivity". No mention of graphs or data – what a relief. The interesting part about this definition is that it is all about the individual’s self-interest. Scientific literacy helps an individual with his or her own personal decision making, his or her own participation in worldly affairs, and his or her own economic productivity.  Take it a step further and look at it from “a whole is greater than the sum of its parts” perspective.  Everyone’s individual parts of self-interest can come together to help the community we live in as a whole.  That is why scientific literacy is so important – it has the power improve or damage the community in which we live.  Modern democracy highlights the importance and need for scientific literacy.  Democracy is supposed to be a government by the people, allowing citizens to have a say in decisions that affect their lives and exercise their rights.  How can people make decisions that they don’t understand? How can they elect candidates without understanding that candidates view on stem cell research or global warming? We are losing out by just picking a side on issues such as these without understanding it. Scientific literacy has the ability to energize individuals and therefore, energize democracy.  It would be like a domino effect.  An increase in scientific literacy could lead to an increase in people’s expectations.  Individuals with high expectations for themselves also indirectly demand high expectations for society.  This demand could lead to people being more informed and/or more active in the political process.  Being more informed and action will lead to more effective politics and ultimately, progress.  This progress would prove to be not just scientific or politics-based – it could slowly and complexly create a robust social revolution.  It could change the way we think, the way we interact, and the way we do things.  For so long we have been chasing knowledge. We want to know more, make more discoveries, advance further.  But now we need to propose the question of how this knowledge and these advances affect our world.  We need to move out of the scope of just knowledge and start seeking/incorporating/creating wisdom.